🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income pays about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you compare it to what average US resident spends. I know dozens of businesses that are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with supporting medical services. When including these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both worker and company payments. Similar to many federal military, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complex (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite increased taxation required, would remain a superior and more affordable approach for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this current situation is that we take a hard look in the mirror and agree that big changes are necessary.